lamina/product-bench

harbor run -d lamina/product-bench

Product Bench — 3-arm (direct / plan / lamina)

Harbor dataset: lamina/product-bench
Hub: https://hub.harborframework.com/datasets/lamina/product-bench

Compares three ways to build small product apps with the same agent and judge:

Arm	What it means
`direct`	Code straight from the brief
`plan`	Short plan, then code
`lamina`	Lamina skills (`/lamina-init` + `/lamina-design`), then code

Initial public Product Bench release. Under this benchmark harness, Lamina’s median score exceeded the direct and plan-first arms on all four tasks. This release covers small greenfield vertical slices only; it does not establish performance on larger applications, brownfield projects, or other models.

What’s in this dataset

12 public tasks = 4 product tasks × 3 arms:

Task	Arms
loan-library	direct · plan · lamina
review-room	direct · plan · lamina
simple-list	direct · plan · lamina
toggle-preference	direct · plan · lamina

Scored on: product source /app/app.mjs + /app/ui.mjs (LLM-as-judge)
Published claim (repo): per-cell median of 3 full re-runs
Not scored: .lamina/ process notes; no /lamina-verify step in this pilot

How to run

# Needs: CURSOR_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_KEY, REWARDKIT_JUDGE=openai/gpt-5.5, LITELLM_DROP_PARAMS=1

harbor run \
  -d lamina/product-bench@latest \
  -a cursor-cli \
  -m cursor/composer-2.5 \
  --env-file .env \
  -n 1

Pinned tag: @product-bench-median-n3 (same content as latest at publish time).

For the full local 3-seed / median protocol:
benchmarks/lb6/pilot/publication/REPRODUCE.md

Results (what we got)

Median writeup:
https://github.com/aryaniyaps/lamina/blob/main/benchmarks/lb6/pilot/publication/local-v3-issue18-rewardkit-median.md
36 public run jobs (3 full matrices):
benchmarks/lb6/pilot/publication/harbor-job-urls.tsv
Example job: https://hub.harborframework.com/jobs/68bf74a0-fed5-4533-ab1a-051885720931