Lamina Product Coding Pilot — 3-arm (direct / plan / lamina)

Harbor dataset: shiv-eshwar/lb6-dev-pilot-issue18-rewardkit
Hub: https://hub.harborframework.com/datasets/shiv-eshwar/lb6-dev-pilot-issue18-rewardkit

Compares three ways to build small product apps with the same agent and judge:

Arm	What it means
direct	Code straight from the brief
plan	Short plan, then code
lamina	Lamina skills (/lamina-init + /lamina-design), then code

Development-only · not confirmatory LaminaBench-6 · not a marketing claim.

What’s in this dataset

12 public tasks = 4 product tasks × 3 arms:

Task	Arms
loan-library	direct · plan · lamina
review-room	direct · plan · lamina
simple-list	direct · plan · lamina
toggle-preference	direct · plan · lamina

• Scored on: product source /app/app.mjs + /app/ui.mjs (LLM-as-judge)
• Published claim (repo): per-cell median of 3 full re-runs
• Not scored: .lamina/ process notes; no /lamina-verify step in this pilot

(Internals for operators: Harbor RewardKit judge openai/gpt-5.5; GitHub issue #18 shape.)

How to run

# Needs: CURSOR_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_KEY, REWARDKIT_JUDGE=openai/gpt-5.5, LITELLM_DROP_PARAMS=1

harbor run \
  -d shiv-eshwar/lb6-dev-pilot-issue18-rewardkit@latest \
  -a cursor-cli \
  -m cursor/composer-2.5 \
  --env-file .env \
  -n 1

Pinned tag: @issue18-rewardkit-median-n3 (same content as latest at publish time).

For the full local 3-seed / median protocol:
benchmarks/lb6/pilot/publication/REPRODUCE.md

Results (what we got)

• Median writeup:
  https://github.com/aryaniyaps/lamina/blob/main/benchmarks/lb6/pilot/publication/local-v3-issue18-rewardkit-median.md
• 36 public run jobs (3 full matrices):
  benchmarks/lb6/pilot/publication/harbor-job-urls.tsv
• Example job: https://hub.harborframework.com/jobs/68bf74a0-fed5-4533-ab1a-051885720931

Fair reading

OK: under this pilot harness, lamina’s median score is above plan and direct on all four tasks.

Not OK: confirmatory LaminaBench-6 proof; that process artifacts were graded; that every seed matched the same deltas.